One can understand the Fed’s frustration over the failure of its interest
rate policy, and its desire to escape the zero bound. However, since the
FOMC has all but said it will increase rates at its December meeting, events
have turned against this course of action. The other major central banks are
in easing mode, and the slowdown in China has further undermined both world
trade flows and commodity prices. The result has been a strong dollar, which
has effectively eliminated any perceived need for higher dollar interest
rates. Meanwhile, the US’s non-financial economy remains subdued.

Last August, a similar situation existed, when the FOMC signalled that a
rise in the Fed Funds Rate might be announced at its September meeting.
Ahead of it, China revalued the dollar by announcing a small devaluation of
its own currency, taking the wind out of the Fed’s sails. While the talking
heads saw this as a failure of Chinese financial policy, it was nothing of
the sort. Given the US was dragging its feet over the yuan’s inclusion in
the SDR, it was a salvo in the financial war between the two states, and the
Fed found itself in the firing line.

Since then the pressure has been mounting from the IMF for the US to back
down over the SDR issue. The result was announced only this week, with the
dollar content hardly changing and the yuan being accommodated mostly at the
expense of the euro from September next year. However, despite the SDR issue
having been dealt with for now, the Fed appears to have very little room for
manoeuver before higher interest rates will give rise to a new financial
crisis.

The chart below illustrates the problem. It is of the Fed Funds Rate since
1980 and the Fiat Money Quantity, which simply put is the sum of the
commercial banks’ reserves at the Fed, plus cash and sight deposits held at
the banks.

From the mid-eighties, successive interest rate peaks (the pecked line) have
declined to the point, which if the trend continues, would indicate a Fed
Funds Rate peak today of roughly 3%. It is clear that the reason for this
declining trend is the increase in bank-related debt, the principal
counterpart to FMQ, and the interest burden it places on borrowers.

This trend of declining interest rate peaks was established before the
Lehman crisis, when the Fed’s response was to rapidly expand its balance
sheet. The result is FMQ growth accelerated from a compounding annual rate
of 5.8% to 14%, taking FMQ to 70% above the previous long-term trend today.
It would therefore require a far smaller increase in interest rates than
indicated by the pecked line to tip the monetary system into a crisis,
perhaps a Fed Funds Rate of as little as 1%.

The idea that we can be so precise about interest rate levels is obviously
nonsense. If the Fed increases the Fed Funds Rate even slightly,
non-financial borrowers often end up paying a significantly higher rate that
includes a larger interest rate spread. The spread between interbank and
corporate borrowing rates becomes an important indicator of financial
stress, and junk bonds are already signalling deteriorating borrowing
conditions. Just the threat of higher interest rates could turn out to be
destabilising for the financial sector.
A problem of the financial sector’s own making
The key metric which has permitted debt to increase at such a pace is the
declining rate of price inflation. This rate has not responded to monetary
inflation as one would expect, having continually fallen from the high rates
of the late ‘seventies, while the quantity of money and credit has increased
significantly. The reason the rate of price inflation has declined is that
by taking over the securities industry in the 1980s, the banks have been
able to combine their licence to create credit out of thin air with the
direct application of this credit into financial instruments. The result has
not only been extremely profitable for the banks, but it has diverted excess
credit from less profitable non-financial activities.

This partly explains why banks have increasingly neglected commercial and
retail customers, concentrating capital allocation into investment banking.
The effect has been to generally confine price inflation to assets, such as
stocks, bonds and property. At the same time consumers have been packaged
through securitised bulk lending for mortgages, student loans, credit cards
and motor loans. Any pretence that banks exist to provide a service for
customers has flown out of the window.

At the same time, this credit and securities duopoly has given the banks the
ability to magically create paper substitutes for physical commodities
through the futures markets, suppressing prices to levels below where they
would otherwise be. In turn, this has reduced the pressure on price
inflation for consumer goods. The decline in price inflation over the last
thirty-five years is therefore the combined result of suppressed commodity
prices, the reduced expansion of credit available to non-financial sectors,
as well as favourable changes in statistical methods.

A declining trend of interest rates has been crucial for the profitable
expansion of financial activities for their own sake. Since assets are
valued with reference to interest rates, the falling trend in interest rates
since the mid-eighties has delivered large profits to the banks and their
financial customers.

The ground-level which inhibits further credit expansion is zero interest
rates, a condition that has existed for seven years. Despite talk of
negative rates, the impetus lower interest rates give to expansion of the
financial side of the economy has already come to an end. Attempts by the
Fed to raise interest rates, even slightly, should be considered in this
light.

The next financial crisis could manifest itself in the coming months. The
time-line of monetary expansion reflected in the chart above is at risk of
being terminated by events. It so, it will mark the end of current central
bank monetary policies and state control of markets, as free markets
reassert realistic pricing. Government bond yields will normalise, stock
markets will fall, and banks will almost certainly fail. Supressed commodity
prices will rise as banks, short through paper contracts, will be forced to
close their positions. Credit default swaps, where the banks are
collectively exposed to losses when interest rates rise, will be a further
source of grief.

When something as epochal as this happens, we can expect the macroeconomic
establishment to be clueless with respect to the problem itself and its
scale. Central banks will naturally revert to the Lehman remedy of further
monetary expansion to cover the losses, whose enormous scale will not be
apparent at the outset. This time, not only will the fiat money quantity
accelerate into hyper-drive, it will be impossible to maintain the
purchasing-power of the world’s reserve currency, therefore threatening that
of all the others.

This month’s FOMC rate decision will not change this outlook, but it could
bring forward the timing.

Alasdair Macleod

Alasdair Macleod is head of research for GoldMoney. He also runs FinanceAndEconomics.org, a website dedicated to sound money advice and demystifying finance and economics. He has a background as a stockbroker, banker and economist.